• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Staff
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Related Links
    • FAQ
    • Peer Review Process
    • News
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter Telegram
International Journal of Pediatrics
Articles in Press
Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 7 (2019)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 6 (2018)
Volume Volume 5 (2017)
Volume Volume 4 (2016)
Volume Volume 3 (2015)
Volume Volume 2 (2014)
Volume Volume 1 (2013)
International Journal of Pediatrics
Rejection Rate 71.93%
Yuliarto, S., Kadafi, K., Anitasari, D. (2019). Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Resuscitation in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome: the differences in Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Parameters. International Journal of Pediatrics, 7(4), 9215-9224. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2018.36587.3186
Saptadi Yuliarto; Kurniawan Kadafi; Dessy Anitasari. "Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Resuscitation in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome: the differences in Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Parameters". International Journal of Pediatrics, 7, 4, 2019, 9215-9224. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2018.36587.3186
Yuliarto, S., Kadafi, K., Anitasari, D. (2019). 'Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Resuscitation in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome: the differences in Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Parameters', International Journal of Pediatrics, 7(4), pp. 9215-9224. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2018.36587.3186
Yuliarto, S., Kadafi, K., Anitasari, D. Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Resuscitation in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome: the differences in Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Parameters. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2019; 7(4): 9215-9224. doi: 10.22038/ijp.2018.36587.3186

Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Resuscitation in Children with Dengue Shock Syndrome: the differences in Clinical Outcomes and Hemodynamic Parameters

Article 2, Volume 7, Issue 4 - Serial Number 64, April 2019, Page 9215-9224  XML PDF (307 K)
DOI: 10.22038/ijp.2018.36587.3186
Authors
Saptadi Yuliarto orcid 1; Kurniawan Kadafiorcid 1; Dessy Anitasariorcid 2
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, University of Brawijaya, Malang, East of Java, Indonesia.
2Department of Pediatrics, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, University of Brawijaya, Malang, East of Java, Indonesia.
Abstract
Background:
Fluid resuscitation is the mainstay of treatment to counteract massive plasma leakage in dengue shock syndrome. We aimed to determine the differences in clinical outcomes and hemodynamic parameters of children with dengue shock syndrome post restrictive and liberal fluid resuscitation. 
Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study of pediatric patients who were between one month to 18 years old, presented with clinical criteria for dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) grade III and IV based on WHO classification of dengue fever in 2011, and admitted to the Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang- Indonesia, from January 2016 to December 2016. Patients were divided in two groups: resuscitated with either 40ml/kg BW (liberal group) solutions; then we analyzed the clinical outcomes and hemodynamic parameters between two groups.  
Results
Among 100 patients, 92 patients were classified as DHF grade III and 8 patients were DHF grade IV. 74 patients were in the restrictive group and 24 patients were in the liberal group. Median age at diagnosis was 6 years old, and 56% of patients were female. No significant differences were observed between length of stay in pediatric intensive care unit (P=0.09), and duration of ventilator use (P=0.68). The restrictive group had 53% lower mortality compared to the liberal group (P=0.18). This study also showed that there were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between two groups based on measurement with USCOM which were preload component (SVV) (P=0.89), inotropy components (SMII) (P=0.07), SVRI (P=0.85) as well as the cardiac index (P=0.66).
Conclusion
This study showed that there is no difference in clinical outcomes (length of mechanical ventilation and length of PICU stay), and hemodynamic parameters (preload, inotropy, afterload, and cardiac index) in Dengue Shock Syndrome patients who receive restrictive or liberal fluid resuscitation.
Keywords
Children; Dengue Shock Syndrome; Liberal; Fluid resuscitation; Restrictive
Statistics
Article View: 106
PDF Download: 69
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by sinaweb.