Document Type : letter to the editor

Authors

1 Assistant professor of ophthalmology, Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate professor of Ophthalmology, Eye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Resident of radiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine Khatam Al Anbiya Hospital Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

10.22038/ijp.2022.63984.4860

Abstract

Juvenile injuries by intraorbital foreign body in extremities are common and usually trivial (1) but they may lead to debilitating sequels in the head and neck. Because of their availability in comparison to other sources of trauma, accidental injuries may occur while children play with their friends. Injuries by pencils are special types of intraorbital foreign body, the final outcome of which is dependent to concurrent injuries of the ocular and also neurologic structure and comorbiditie. Orbital injury requires comprehensive evaluation, especially in child victims when there is not sufficient information regarding trauma mechanism and the intraorbital foreign body should be ruled out before any closure of wounds, as shown in the sample case presented here. In school age children with a history of falling, intraorbital fragments of pencils should be kept in mind. Preoperative information about the true number and exact location of retained fragments is paramount for an appropriate management. When there is high suspicion for retained foreign body, further detailed studies with CT and if needed MR scans and in selected cases plain X- ray are very helpful.

Keywords

  1. Kim YJ, Ahn JY, Kim BJ, Kim MN, Song KY. A Case of Graphite Foreign Body Misdiagnosed as Blue Nevus. Annals of Dermatology 2007; 19: 166.
  2. Gates TR, Hardjasudarma M. Computed tomography findings of an intraorbital pencil. The American journal of emergency medicine 1993; 11: 433-434.
  3. Herman T, Shackelford G, Tychsen L. Unrecognized retention of intraorbital graphite pencil fragments: the role of computerized tomography. Pediatric radiology 1995; 25: 535-537.
  4. Elgin U, Berker N, Nalcacioglu P, Ucan N. Nonsurgical management of an intraorbital pencil without cranial or globe penetration. Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus 2007; 44: 307-308.
  5. Al-Mujaini A, Al-Senawi R, Ganesh A, Al-Zuhaibi S, Al-Dhuhli H. Intraorbital foreign body: clinical presentation, radiological appearance and management. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2008; 8: 69-74.
  6. Ozer S, Onal B, Akbay A, Onerci M. Craniocerebral injury resulting from pencil penetration. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2010; 267: 155-157.
  7. Shelsta HN, Bilyk JR, Rubin PA, Penne RB, Carrasco JR. Wooden intraorbital foreign body injuries: clinical characteristics and outcomes of 23 patients. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2010; 26: 238-244.
  8. Fisher SB, Clifton MS, Bhatia AM. Pencils and pens: an under-recognized source of penetrating injuries in children. The American Surgeon 2011; 77: 1076-1080.
  9. Al-Otaibi F, Baeesa S. Occult orbitocranial penetrating pencil injury in a child. Case reports in surgery 2012; 2012.
  10. Ahmad SS, FAEH F, Ghani SA, Peng KS, Sellamuthu P. 5-year-old girl with left upper eyelid swelling. Digital journal of ophthalmology: DJO/sponsored by Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 2012; 18: 15.
  11. Choudhri AF, Patel BJ, Phillips ME, Mills KA, Whitehead MT, Fleming JC. Diamagnetic susceptibility artifact associated with graphite foreign body of the orbit. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2013; 29: e105-e107.
  12. aş S, Top H. Intraorbital wooden foreign body: clinical analysis of 32 cases, a 10-year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2014; 20: 51-55.
  13. Torabi HR, Tabatabai S-A. Intraorbital Penetrating Pencil Injury in a Child. Trauma Monthly 2016.
  14. Cho W-K, Ko AC, Eatamadi H, Al-Ali A, Abboud J-P, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS. Orbital and orbitocranial trauma from pencil fragments: role of timely diagnosis and management. American journal of ophthalmology 2017; 180: 46-54.
  15. Bhowmik R. Ferromagnetism in lead graphite-pencils and magnetic composite with CoFe 2 O 4 particles. Composites Part B: Engineering 2012; 43: 503-509.
  16. Willam E. Brant CAH. Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
  17. Javadrashid R, Golamian M, Shahrzad M, Hajalioghli P, Shahmorady Z, Fouladi DF, Sadrarhami S, Akhoundzadeh L. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2016.
  18. Kiarudi AH, Eghbal MJ, Safi Y, Aghdasi MM, Fazlyab M. The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review of literature. Iranian endodontic journal 2014; 10: 16-25.
  19. Di Gaeta A, Giurazza F, Capobianco E, Diano A, Muto M. Intraorbital wooden foreign body detected by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The neuroradiology journal 2017; 30: 88-91.