1 Government Medical College Srinagar,India

2 Government Medical College Jammu ,India

3 Government Medical College Srinagar,india


A female one month old with features supporting a diagnosis of neonatal progeroid syndrome(WRS)  presented to our neonatology section of GB pant children hospital Srinagar .she had prenatal and post natal growth failure, generalized lipotrophy, triangular face, psedohydrocephalous, sparse scalp hair and eye brows, prominent scalp veins and greatly widened anterior fontenella.



The neonatal progeroid syndrome (WRS) is a very rare genetic disorder. There has been around 30 cases of WRS reported in literature..It represents complex symptoms with an unknown cause and pathogenesis [1].It characterizes a premature aging syndrome in which several features  of aging are apparent at birth therefore allowing their grouping as a neonatal progeroid condition [2].In 1977 Rautenstrauch and snigula reported on 2 sisters with a progeria like syndrome.[3].In 1979 Weidman described 2 unrelated males with same condition[4].In1981 Devos et al.[5)]reported another child whose parents were double first cousins, and in 1988 Rudin et al [6]reported on a single affected child. After that more patients were reported .Martin et al [7] described neuropathlogical studies and suggested the WRS is a form of sudanophilic leucodystrothy. Longevity of these patients is unknown. Here we report a Kashmiri child with  WRS who presented at one month of age.

Case report

A one month old child first birth order,product  of non consangious marriage. Pregnancy was uncomplicated with no ologohydroamnious or drug intake by mother. Maternal and paternal age was 28 and 34 years respectively. Child was born by LSCS and delivery was uncomplicated. Her birth weight was 2 kgs and she was full term .The patient was referred to our hospital at one month of age with decreased feeding, inadequate weight gain and abnormal facial features...there was no family history of such symptoms in family.

The patient had weight o9f 2.1 kgs, and length was 52 cm .the occipitofrontal circumference(OFC) was46cm.

The patient has craniofacial disproportion which gives a pseudo hydrocephalic appearance with wide anterior fontenella and dry sparse scalp hair. There was prominent large fore head and visible dilated scalp veins. The face was triangular, ears were low set ,sparse eye brows with long eye lashes, nasal bride was depressed and long philtrum.There was also protruding lower jaw ,neck was short and both hands and feet were relatively large with long fingers and toes with loss of subcutaneous fat over them. There was generalized lipotrophy all over the body.


Figure 1 &2

Showing craniofacial disproportion ,pseudo hydrocephalic appearance, sparse scalp hair, visible dilated scalp veins and absence of subcutaneous fat.



Chest examinations was normal. Cardiac examination revealed grade 3 systolic murmer best heard in left second and third intercostals space.By inspection of abdomen there was generalized bulge with apparent lobulation on the anterior abdominal wall.(mostly distended loops of intestine).umbilicus was shifted downward a flat .Neurological examination was normal. Echocardiography was suggestive of small PDA .Abdominal USG was normal. Complete blood picture was normal apart from low hemoglobin level(7.8g/dl)serum ca phosphorous and alkaline phosphatases were normal. Thyroid profile was also normal.

Ct and MRI brain did not revealed any abnormality.


We report a one month old child with features of premature aging in favor of diagnosis of WRS.These features  included intrauterine and post natal growth failure and old looking face, pdedohydrocephalous , craniofacial disproportion large anterior fontenella, prominent scalp veins, sparse scalp hair and eyebrows sunken eyes, low set ears,  marked reduced subcutaneous fat and relatively large feet and hands .The same features were reported previously [4],[5],[6],[7],[8]and [9]. In our patient the abdomen appeared large and prominent as was reported earlier[10]

However some characteristic features reported inWRS patients are missing in our patient like presence of neonatal teeth which is considered very helpful in diagnosis [3],[4],[5].However neonatal teeth were not reported in a Turkish patient and in other 19 published cases.

Feeding difficulties reported in many patients with WRS [7]were not reported in  our patient where in spite of high caloric nutrition, the increase in weight was not  satisfactory and she  was underweight and anemic. Skeletal findings reported in some WRS patients including scoliosis characteristics  of a neuromuscular curve [15], osteoporosis with loose joints, camptodactyly/ joint contracture [11], and congenital hip dysplasia [16] were not reported in

our patient. However our patient should be followed up regularly as these findings

 may represent progression

 Ocular manifestations include, cloudy cornea with congenital glaucoma, other  dermatological manifestations like dermatitis/acrodermatitis enteropathica reported  in some patients  [14] were not reported in our patient

 Microstomia as reported with WRS [3]and [13] was also reported in our patient. Also our patient  had small maxilla.

Ct findings  like Dandy walker cyst and ventriculomegaly, basal ganglia calcification reported in some patients [11]and agenesis of corpus callosum reported in other patients[16]were not reported in our  patient.

Patients with WRS usually have short life expectations [15] the disease is usually lethal by 7 months however some have reported  survival of patients up to teens and 20s[18]

Our patient was the product of non consanguineous marriage..However Arboleda[2] et al reported it in parents with consanguineous marriage Supporting its autosomal inheritance.

The etiology of WRS remains unknown. Several studies analyzing telomere  length and lamin A gene had not revealed any alterations. However, mutations  in LMNA had been   reported in several other atypical progeroid syndromes.  Based on these observations, several hypotheses could be withdrawn concerning the etiology of WRS. The study of genes associated with lamin A  metabolism, such as Zmpste24, and the metabolic pathways associated with  insulin, such as protein kinaseB or AKT, are of particular interest. WRS   characteristic werebelieved to indicate that the discovery of the gene and the metabolic pathway associated with this syndrome will most likely lead to new knowledge about the physiopathology of humanaging [2]. However mutations in Lamin A/C (LMNA) genewere not found in four WRS  patients, and in particular,G608G mutation (GGC > GGT transition) which is associated with most cases of Hutchinson Gilford  progeria (OMIM176670).  These findings suggest that WRS represents a distinct progeroid entity that may be caused by recessive  mutations of a different gene [20].

Increased chromosomal breakage and the presence of basal ganglia calcification  after early childhood suggest that DNArepair defects are involved in the  pathogenesis of this disorder.LMNA, ERCC8, or ZMPSTE24 gene mutations  could not acount for the disorders in these patients. Thus this rare disorder  represents a complex of symptoms with unknown cause and pathogenesis, and  more than one  disease may account      for the clinical variability of  WRS [11]. Terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length to evaluate whether  the patient’s premature aging process is accompaniedby shortening of  telomere length in her cultured fibroblastswas studied. Mean TRF of  13.5 kb found in the patient’s fibroblasts was not shortened as compared to  that of normalfibroblasts. These results differ from those observed in Hutch-inson Gilford progeria . Jager et al. [21] reported that lackof cellular differentiation  capacity in WRS patients may be responsible for the clinical appearance and  symptoms of this rare disorder. Karyotype was normal in  patients with WRS  [11] as was found in our patient. Ultrasound examination can be a useful tool in prenatal diagnosis of this rare  syndrome. 


During pregnancy growth retardation particularly in the biparietal diameter  and abdominal diameters but not in the femoral length can be detected through serial  ultrasound scans [12].

To conclude WRS represents a complex of symptoms and signs with an  unknown cause and pathogenesis. Variabilityin the phenotype of WRS is  clear, however the phenotype remains distinct enough to allow a secure 

diagnosis [13]. This case is a contribution to the exact description of that  extremely rare syndrome. We hope to facilitate establishing the major    and minor criteria to help the differential diagnosis in   difficult cases because of heterogeneity. We have to discuss if the WRS  really represents a  separate genetic entity within the group of premature aging syndromes. Long  term follow up of patients with WRS should provide information relative   to their ultimate psychomotor development.



  [1] Hoppen T, Hausser I, Theile U, Ferrari R, Mu¨ller W, Rister M.
Neonatal progeroid syndrome (Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syn-
drome): case report and review of the literature. Klin Pediatr
[2] Arboleda G, Ramı´ rez N, Arboleda H. The neonatal progeroid
syndrome (Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch): a model for the study of
human aging? Exp Gerontol 2007;42(10):939–43.
[3] Rautenstrauch T, Snigula F. Progeria: a cell culture study and
clinical report of familial incidence. Eur J Pediatr
[4] Wiedemann HR. An unidentified neonatal progeroid syndrome:
follow up report. Eur J Pediatr 1979;130:65–70.
[5] Devos EA, Leroy JG, Frijns JP, Berghe H. The Wiedemann-
Rautenstrauch or neonatal progeroid syndrome. Eur J Pediatr
[6] Rudin C, Thommen L, Fliegel C, Steinmann B, Bilhler U. The
neonatal pseudohydrocephalic progeroid syndrome (Wiedemann-
Rautenstrauch). Eur J Pediatr 1988;147:433–8.
[7] Martin JJ, Ceuterick CM, Leroy JG, Devos EA, Roelens JG. The
Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch or neonatal progeroid syndrome.
Neuropathological study of a case. Neuropediatrics 1984;15:43–8.
[8] Hoppen T, Naumann A, Theile U, Rister M. Siblings with
neonatal progeroid syndrome (Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch). Klin
Padiatr 2004;216(2):70–1.
[9] Tunc T, Bulbul A, Erdinc K, Sarici SU, Gul D, Ozcan O. The
Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch or neonatal progeroid syndrome:
report of a patient with hypospadias. Genet Couns
[10] Snigula F, Rautenstrauch T. A new neonatal progeroid syndrome.
Eur J Pediatr 1981;136:325.
[11] Hou JW. Natural course of neonatal progeroid syndrome. Pediatr
Neonatol 2009;50(3):102–9.
[12] Castineyra G, Panal M, Lopez Presas H, Goldschmidt E, Sanchez
JM. Two sibs with Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome: possi-
bilities of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound. J Med Genet
[13] Pivnick EK, Angle B, Kaufman RA, Hall BD, Pitukcheewanont
P, Hersh JH, Fowlkes JL, Sanders LP, O’Brien JM, Carroll GS,
Gunther WM, Morrow HG, Burghen GA, Ward JC. Neonatal
progeroid (Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch) syndrome: report of five
new cases and review. Am J Med Genet 2000;17(90 (2)):131–40.
[14] Bitoun P, Lachassine E, Sellier N, Sauvion S, Gaudelus J. The
Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch neonatal progeroid syndrome: a case
report and review of the literature. Clin Dysmorphol
[15] Thorey F, Ja¨ger M, Seller K, Krauspe R, Wild A. Kyphoscoliosis
in Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch-syndrome (neonatal progeroid syn-
drome). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2003;141(3):341–4.
[16] Abdel-Salam GM, Czeizel AE. A new case of neonatal progeroid
syndrome with agenesis of corpus callosum. Genet Couns
[17] Arboleda H, Quintero L, Yunis E. Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch
neonatal progeroid syndrome: report of three new patients. I Med
Genet 1997;34:433–7.
[18] caring4cancer. Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome.  http://
[19] Arboleda G, Morales LC, Quintero L, Arboleda H. Neonatal
progeroid syndrome (Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome):
report of three affected sibs. Am J Med Genet A
[20] Morales LC, Arboleda G, Rodrı´ guez Y, Forero DA, Ramı´ rez N,Yunis JJ, Arboleda H. Absence of Lamin A/C gene mutations in     four Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome patients. Am J MedGenet A 2009;149A(12):2695–9.
[21] Ja¨ger M, Thorey F, Westhoff B, Wild A, Krauspe R. In vitroosteogenic differentiation is affected in Wiedemann-Rautenstr-auch-syndrome (WRS). In Vivo 2005;19(5):831–6.